Just because we sell something doesn't mean it is correct to dismiss everything we say. When you have something important to say, seeking attention is warranted. > I know that there's a long history of attention-seeking blog posts from companies selling products It's a big deal to folks who could be caught up in the above scenario. Once you take that new fact into consideration and add the facts conveyed in the linked blog post and multiply it by tens of millions of Macs, you now have a high probability outcome that an organization will lose a device, act as if the contents are inaccessible to the thief, and learn later that the were acting on bad information. Back in reality, a significant number of devices set up by organizations do not have FileVault enabled by default. If we had written a blog post saying "Data on Encrypted iPhones can be trivially accessed unless a passcode is enabled", I would agree with your point because.ġ) There is no historic context that Passcodes and encryption were considered the same thing.Ģ) There are no tools that confuse the differences between a passcode being set and encryption being on.ģ) It is extremely difficult to set up an iPhone today without a passcode.īut none of those things are true on the Mac. If what you stated earlier was actually the truth, then FileVault would be enabled on far more devices and your point about the post not really being as big of a deal as we are trumping it up to be would have some merit. It doesn't really change the point, though, because this isn't a bypass or flaw in the encryption systemīut it does.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |